7 04 2010

It was brought to my attention recently that this week on Facebook there are a group of people running an “Anti-Scientology Week” (unfortunately I can’t export a link to it so you will have to search under events)

Now I am not normally someone to jump on the bandwagon of Facebook groups as they are about as useful a chocolate teapot, no one is ever going to make changes to something just because some bunch of herberts on Facebook tells them too.

But it did get me thinking a bit more about Scientology; now I wouldn’t say that I am completely ignorant of the basics of Scientology but that would certainly be the limit of my knowledge.

I guess I have always been the same as a lot of other people and just dismissed them as being a slightly kooky bunch who aren’t really doing any real harm and seem to carry out a lot of charitable acts. Oh and of course John Travolta and Tom Cruise are big proponents of the cause.

Well after a few days of digging around and research I must admit I am less inclined to dismiss them as slightly kooky but harmless, in fact I think I would say that what I have read leads me to view them as something altogether more worrisome.

Whilst undoubtedly they do a lot of good through their charitable works around the world (for which they are to be commended) there seems to be a far darker under current running through Scientology. Now that isn’t to say that Scientologists are bad people or that they are any less entitled then anyone else to follow their beliefs.

I’m not going to go into whether or not I deem Scientology to be a religion or not, that is for other people to debate, nor am I going to start picking apart their beliefs, for some information on what scientologists broadly believe click here, again that is best left to other people.

What I am interested in and slightly concerned over is the way the church responds to anyone who is deemed to be critical of the church or even wants to ask questions of which the church and it’s spokespeople disapprove.

There are numerous incidents of the church or it’s spokes people acting in a less than helpful manner when asked certain questions; the big one that seems to trigger the worst response is whether or not the Scientology is a cult.

Now I can understand that to some people with very strong beliefs this might come across as an offensive or disrespectful line of questioning, but at the same time there must be a reason for people to ask this sort of question and hold these beliefs regarding scientology.

Have a look at the video here to see how senior church spokesman Tommy Davis responds to this question when asked it by BBC journalist John Sweeney for Panorama

There are countless recordings showing similar responses to what really and truly whilst not an easy question to face is a valid one:

Is Scientology a cult?

I for one would politely suggest that if you wish people to take you seriously and give you respect the very least you need to do is show respect back, grant people the access they want, answer their questions; don’t just shout and scream at them or cut across anything they try to say.

If Scientology isn’t a cult maybe they shouldn’t be quite so defensive about the whole subject and should take the moral high ground.

The other thing I found completely distasteful about Scientology is their policy of carrying out “fair game ” attacks on their detractors, critics and many others that try to dig a little deeper into their activities.

Although the church officially suspended the practice of fair gaming people as far back as 1968 there is evidence to suggest that the practice never really went away, former high ranking members of the church have testified under oath that as part of their work within the organisation they were privy to our responsible for the carrying out of fair game attacks on the opponents of the church.

When you read about people being followed around, receiving nuisance calls and being the targets of smear campaigns it sounds less and less like the acts of a religion and more and more like a bad mob movie.

I guess for me I just can’t reconcile the two sides of the coin; on one hand we have a church that offers a lot of help to people that need it and undoubtedly has enriched the lives of thousands, on the other hand we see see childish reactions to valid questions and the strong-arming of the people who dare to ask them.

Unfortunately for Scientology I think that until they sort out some of the contradictions in the way they act there are always going to be those people who oppose them.



2 responses

7 04 2010
Marc Abian

A well-written piece and you obviously know something of the subject, but with regards to the charitable work the CoS supposedly carries out, I’m afraid you have only seen the PR hype which the CoS itself propagates. There is no charity within CoS, indeed it goes against L Ron Hubbard’s teachings. It is one of the reasons CoS has been refused charitable status in the UK. What you have seen is the actions of the Scientology Volunteer Ministers and their purpose is nothing more than to spread Scientology wherever possible.

Groups of these untrained volunteers flock to disaster areas such as Haiti and it has been documented that medical personnel were actually left stranded at airports because these VMs were taking up seats on planes. John Travolta may have flown a jet in but his plane landed at the expense of a slot which was desperately needed by planes carrying medical supplies and staff.

As for the work these Volunteer Ministers do, they arrive with no supplies either for themselves or the victims of the disaster. Instead they hand out supplies from the likes of the Red Cross and make sure there are plenty of photo opportunities of them doing so. What they do bring along is Scientology literature and leaflets.

Indeed they often do more harm than good since they will instruct survivors not to attend or seek any help from any medical staff connected with psychiatric services.

Scientology does not help people or enrich lives. It destroys lives.

7 04 2010
Tom Webster

Hi Marc,

Thanks for coming in on that, I readily admit that my knowledge of CoS is quite frankly limited in some areas and I’ll be honest I try and avoid criticising those particular subjects too much as I don’t want to add any more fuel to the argument that all of the critics of CoS are ill informed etc.

It is funny that you mention that CoS are very keen to propagate their own PR information relating to their charity efforts, a lot of what I was able to find regarding their charitable works did sound a little bit like someone had sent out a pack of handy, ready to use information in order to make everything sound as glowing as possible, besides seeing how they are about all other media publicity it would certainly fit the bill.

The stance that Scientology takes on psychiatry is positively crazy, I really do not see how they expect mainstream credibility with views like these.

Thanks again for your input, anything else you wish to share would be more than welcome

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: